Financhill
Buy
52

ESTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$36.63
Seasonality move :
-9.53%
Day range:
$35.30 - $37.47
52-week range:
$26.56 - $58.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
6.16x
P/B ratio:
27.47x
Volume:
306.9K
Avg. volume:
476.3K
1-year change:
-31.04%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$166M
EPS (TTM):
-$3.10

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ESTA
Establishment Labs Holdings
$41.1M -$0.83 16.56% -8.45% $53.00
CVM
CEL-SCI
-- -- -- -- $8.00
IGC
IGC Pharma
$305K -$0.02 3.39% -50% $3.88
NBY
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
$3M -$0.88 14.03% -95.43% $0.85
PACS
PACS Group
$1.1B $0.42 15.23% 26.13% $35.50
VTRS
Viatris
$3.2B $0.49 -9.19% 446.59% $11.6043
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ESTA
Establishment Labs Holdings
$36.62 $53.00 $1.1B -- $0.00 0% 6.16x
CVM
CEL-SCI
$2.51 $8.00 $7.6M -- $0.00 0% --
IGC
IGC Pharma
$0.34 $3.88 $26.8M -- $0.00 0% 19.81x
NBY
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
$0.57 $0.85 $3.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.16x
PACS
PACS Group
$9.82 $35.50 $1.5B 20.01x $0.00 0% 0.43x
VTRS
Viatris
$8.2900 $11.6043 $9.7B -- $0.12 5.79% 0.69x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ESTA
Establishment Labs Holdings
85.11% -0.370 18.68% 1.92x
CVM
CEL-SCI
-- 1.145 -- --
IGC
IGC Pharma
2.1% -0.278 0.51% 0.21x
NBY
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
4.54% -0.186 1.51% 0.75x
PACS
PACS Group
46.18% -0.032 10.9% 1.57x
VTRS
Viatris
47.53% 0.971 137.27% 0.77x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ESTA
Establishment Labs Holdings
$27.8M -$16.9M -35.74% -196.89% -33.7% -$21.8M
CVM
CEL-SCI
-- -$6.4M -- -- -- -$4.4M
IGC
IGC Pharma
$104K -$1.9M -114.2% -116.24% -730.74% -$1.4M
NBY
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
$1.6M -$2.7M -334.47% -461.38% -44% -$1.3M
PACS
PACS Group
$153.9M $710K -- -- -0.33% -$76.7M
VTRS
Viatris
$1.2B -$8.9M -10.98% -20.24% -91.62% $459.1M

Establishment Labs Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ESTA or CVM?

    CEL-SCI has a net margin of -50.05% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of --. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -196.89% beat CEL-SCI's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    67.21% -$0.70 $258.9M
    CVM
    CEL-SCI
    -- -$2.40 --
  • What do Analysts Say About ESTA or CVM?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.73%. On the other hand CEL-SCI has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9462.71%. Given that CEL-SCI has higher upside potential than Establishment Labs Holdings, analysts believe CEL-SCI is more attractive than Establishment Labs Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    5 1 0
    CVM
    CEL-SCI
    1 0 0
  • Is ESTA or CVM More Risky?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.804% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEL-SCI has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.196%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESTA or CVM?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEL-SCI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEL-SCI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ESTA or CVM?

    Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.4M, which are larger than CEL-SCI quarterly revenues of --. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$20.7M is lower than CEL-SCI's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEL-SCI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 6.16x versus -- for CEL-SCI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    6.16x -- $41.4M -$20.7M
    CVM
    CEL-SCI
    -- -- -- -$6.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns ESTA or IGC?

    IGC Pharma has a net margin of -50.05% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of -711.67%. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -196.89% beat IGC Pharma's return on equity of -116.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    67.21% -$0.70 $258.9M
    IGC
    IGC Pharma
    40.47% -$0.02 $6.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ESTA or IGC?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.73%. On the other hand IGC Pharma has an analysts' consensus of $3.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1050.19%. Given that IGC Pharma has higher upside potential than Establishment Labs Holdings, analysts believe IGC Pharma is more attractive than Establishment Labs Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    5 1 0
    IGC
    IGC Pharma
    2 0 0
  • Is ESTA or IGC More Risky?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.804% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IGC Pharma has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.252%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESTA or IGC?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IGC Pharma offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IGC Pharma pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ESTA or IGC?

    Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.4M, which are larger than IGC Pharma quarterly revenues of $257K. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$20.7M is lower than IGC Pharma's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IGC Pharma's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 6.16x versus 19.81x for IGC Pharma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    6.16x -- $41.4M -$20.7M
    IGC
    IGC Pharma
    19.81x -- $257K -$1.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns ESTA or NBY?

    NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -50.05% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of -49.65%. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -196.89% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    67.21% -$0.70 $258.9M
    NBY
    NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
    65.26% $1.42 $1.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About ESTA or NBY?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.73%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 49.2%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Establishment Labs Holdings, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Establishment Labs Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    5 1 0
    NBY
    NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
    1 0 0
  • Is ESTA or NBY More Risky?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.804% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.08%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESTA or NBY?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ESTA or NBY?

    Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.4M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$20.7M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 6.16x versus 0.16x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    6.16x -- $41.4M -$20.7M
    NBY
    NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
    0.16x -- $2.4M $7.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns ESTA or PACS?

    PACS Group has a net margin of -50.05% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of -1.11%. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -196.89% beat PACS Group's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    67.21% -$0.70 $258.9M
    PACS
    PACS Group
    15.67% -$0.07 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ESTA or PACS?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.73%. On the other hand PACS Group has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 261.51%. Given that PACS Group has higher upside potential than Establishment Labs Holdings, analysts believe PACS Group is more attractive than Establishment Labs Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    5 1 0
    PACS
    PACS Group
    3 0 0
  • Is ESTA or PACS More Risky?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.804% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACS Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESTA or PACS?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACS Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACS Group pays out 71.23% of its earnings as a dividend. PACS Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ESTA or PACS?

    Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.4M, which are smaller than PACS Group quarterly revenues of $981.8M. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$20.7M is lower than PACS Group's net income of -$10.9M. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PACS Group's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 6.16x versus 0.43x for PACS Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    6.16x -- $41.4M -$20.7M
    PACS
    PACS Group
    0.43x 20.01x $981.8M -$10.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns ESTA or VTRS?

    Viatris has a net margin of -50.05% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of -93.48%. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -196.89% beat Viatris's return on equity of -20.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    67.21% -$0.70 $258.9M
    VTRS
    Viatris
    35.68% -$2.55 $29.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About ESTA or VTRS?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.73%. On the other hand Viatris has an analysts' consensus of $11.6043 which suggests that it could grow by 39.98%. Given that Establishment Labs Holdings has higher upside potential than Viatris, analysts believe Establishment Labs Holdings is more attractive than Viatris.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    5 1 0
    VTRS
    Viatris
    2 5 0
  • Is ESTA or VTRS More Risky?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.804% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viatris has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.265%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESTA or VTRS?

    Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viatris offers a yield of 5.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viatris pays out -90.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ESTA or VTRS?

    Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.4M, which are smaller than Viatris quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$20.7M is higher than Viatris's net income of -$3B. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viatris's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 6.16x versus 0.69x for Viatris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ESTA
    Establishment Labs Holdings
    6.16x -- $41.4M -$20.7M
    VTRS
    Viatris
    0.69x -- $3.3B -$3B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Rambus (RMBS) Stock Forecast, Can the Rally Continue in 2025?
Rambus (RMBS) Stock Forecast, Can the Rally Continue in 2025?

Rambus has flown under the radar, but the numbers tell…

Celsius Stock Forecast: Will Earnings Spark Another Surge?
Celsius Stock Forecast: Will Earnings Spark Another Surge?

Energy drink seller Celsius Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CELH) has reported somewhat…

Will DigitalOcean Stock Bounce Back?
Will DigitalOcean Stock Bounce Back?

DigitalOcean (NYSE:DOCN) has run into the proverbial brick wall with…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x

Sell
33
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Buy
60
MRUS alert for May 24

Merus NV [MRUS] is up 32.55% over the past day.

Buy
57
RGC alert for May 24

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.43% over the past day.

Buy
90
OKLO alert for May 24

Oklo [OKLO] is up 23.11% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock